• Rules & procedures
    • Dispute types and process
    • Hearings and mediation
    • Rules of the Sports Tribunal
    • Costs
    • Legal assistance
    • Appeal a Tribunal decision
  • Decisions
    • All Decisions
    • Results
  • News
  • Resources
    • Guide to the Sports Tribunal
    • Sports Tribunal Annual Reports
    • Independent Reports
    • Links
    • Forms / Proceeding Forms
  • About us
    • About the Sports Tribunal
    • Members of the Tribunal
    • Registrar of the Sports Tribunal
    • History
    • FAQ
  • Contact

Decisions

Find the latest Tribunal decisions. You may also be interested in the Results of decisions.

Find Decisions

Latest decisions

206

cases

Expand all

Drug Free Sport New Zealand v A Minor

04/18 · Decision 21 May 2018

Overview:

Anti-doping involving a minor - tested positive for prohibited substance Dimethylpentylamine - taken from athlete in competition - provisionally suspended without opposition - admitted violation - joint memorandum filed as to proposed sanction - unintentional use of specified substance - consumed "Kick... pre-workout" product - standard 2 year period of ineligibility - reduced sanction no significant fault - appropriate sanction having regard to degree of fault - strict obligation on athletes under the Code - youth, inexperience - one-off mistake - parties proposed appropriate period of ineligibility 4 months - low level fault - Tribunal considered material filed - made an Order as proposed - suspended for 4 months to 26 June 2018 - credit for provisional suspension served and backdating for timely admission

Decision
PDF, 65 KB
Media Release
PDF, 22 KB

Anti-doping case · Other · 22 May 2018

Drug Free Sport New Zealand v Michael Gregory (Greg) Strickland

03/18 · Decision 18 May 2018

Overview:

Anti-doping - Medsafe investigation into NZ Clenbuterol - rugby league player (MS) admitted violation of Sports Anti-Doping Rules (SADR) 2015 rule 2.2 and 2.6 - non-specified substance - admitted purchasing to aid weight-loss - lack of knowledge of substance - violation not intentional - presumptive... two year period of ineligibility applied - suspended for two years from 27 May 2017 backdated for timely admission and substantial delay

Decision
PDF, 48 KB
Media Release
PDF, 22 KB
Provisional Suspension Order
PDF, 42 KB

Anti-doping case · Rugby League · 18 May 2018

Drug Free Sport New Zealand v Karl Murray

02/17 · Decision 8 May 2018

Overview:

Anti-doping - Cyclist (M) intentional use of non- specified substance during Tour of Northland - presumptive period of ineligibility four years - second anti-doping violation subject to "twice the period of ineligibility" - challenge to a previous New Caledonia ban being counted as first violation -... New Caledonia non-signatory to the Code - New Caledonia decision recognised by UCI and in New Zealand - Tribunal satisfied violation and sanction should be recognised - consistent with interpretation of Rule 15 and the Code purpose - Tour of Northland second violation - suspended for eight years from 11 May 2017.

Sanction Decision
PDF, 53 KB
Media Release
PDF, 24 KB
ADRV Decision
PDF, 87 KB

Anti-doping case · Cycling · 9 May 2018

Announcement of Anti-Doping Decision (all details relating to case are confidential)

11/17 · Decision 12 March 2018

Overview:

The Sports Tribunal has heard and decided an anti-doping application and found it was not proven. All details relating to this case are strictly confidential, pursuant to the Sports Anti-Doping Rules.

Anti-doping case · 12 April 2018

Drug Free Sport New Zealand v Travell Ngatoko

13/17 · Decision 28 February 2018

Overview:

Anti-doping – banned player Travell Ngatoko (TN) played for Coastal Cobras’ Taranaki based rugby league team – 18 March 2017 – original suspension 6 months for anti-doping rule violation – expiry 3 May 2017 – TN admitted violation of playing while still ineligible, but said he had never been... advised what he could and could not do while banned – TN asked to be heard as to sanction – period of further ineligibility 6 months – equal to original sanction under SADR 10.12.3 – Tribunal said athletes have personal responsibilities to make themselves aware of their obligations in relation to the anti-drug regime – TN should have taken steps and requested information to ensure he understood the effect of the ban – Tribunal considered nature of rugby league season and concluded it would be disproportionate and unfair if because timing of proceedings, TN missed opportunity to obtain representative selection – Tribunal reduced to 4 months – timely admission and co-operation – further 3 months credited for period already served for provisional suspension – TN ineligible to participate in any sport until 31 March 2018

Provisional Suspension Order
PDF, 44 KB
Decision
PDF, 70 KB
Media Release
PDF, 23 KB

Anti-doping case · Rugby League · 15 March 2018

Show more

  • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • © 2018 Sports Tribunal of New Zealand
  • •Privacy & Copyright