-
X, Y & Z v Fencing NZ
Bias, Non anti-doping case decisions, Selection/nomination appeals, Selection/nomination criteria: whether material on which could reasonably be based, Selection/nomination criteria: whether properly followed/implementedAppeal – fencing – Fencing NZ – three athletes not selected for Junior Worlds in Wuxi, China – decision appealed on three grounds – selection criteria not properly followed and/or implemented – no material on which the decision could be made – selection decision affected by actual bias – urgency – hearing held – found…
-
Playaz v Volleyball NZ (ST 19/24)
Appeal against decision of NSO, Eligibility/Ineligibility, Jurisdiction, Non anti-doping case decisions, Other appealsAppeal – volleyball – Volleyball NZ – appellant’s team lost a Northern Zone competition match and complained that the opposition team had fielded an ineligible player – that there were failures to comply with Volleyball NZ Transfer Policy and the player was subject to a 12-month suspension – decisions of the regional association and Volleyball…
-
Sammie Maxwell v Cycling New Zealand-costs
Costs application- athlete applying for substantial costs –Cycling New Zealand – resists application – hearing – exceptional case – substantial award appropriate – $15,000 costs awarded in favour of athlete
-
Rose Time-Taotua v School Sport New Zealand
Appeal – School Sport NZ – netball – appellant played for host school and applied for exemption to play for that school in the Lower North Island Secondary Schools competition – application declined – appeal based on breach of natural justice and decision-making body acted outside its powers or jurisdiction– SSNZ submit appellant does not…
-
Sloan Frost v Motorcycling New Zealand
Appeal – Motorcycle Road Racing – Motorcycling New Zealand – appellant only had four rounds to contribute to net points calculation due to one of the five rounds his son intended to race in was not run – appeal based on breach of natural justice – alleged Judiciary Committee was biased and did not provide…
-
Lukas Murphy v Cycling New Zealand
Appeal against decision of NSO, Non anti-doping case decisions, Selection/nomination criteria: whether properly followed/implemented, Selection/nomination criteria: whether reasonable opportunity to satisfyAppeal – Road Racing – Cycling New Zealand – athlete not selected for U23 Individual Time Trial event at 2024 UCI World Champs –- decision appealed on basis the selection criteria not properly followed and/or implemented – no reasonable opportunity to meet the criteria – no material on which the decision could be made –…
-
Hannah Thomas v Canoe Slalom New Zealand
Appeal against decision of NSO, Non anti-doping case decisions, Non-nomination for Olympics, Selection/nomination criteria: whether properly followed/implementedAppeal – Canoe Slalom – Canoe Slalom New Zealand – athlete not nominated for Olympic selection – appeal based on not properly implementing the nomination criteria – no opportunity to meet the criteria – no material on which to base the decision – urgency – decision made on the papers – grounds of appeal not…
-
Sammie Maxwell v Cycling New Zealand
Appeal against decision of NSO, Bias, Non anti-doping case decisions, Non-nomination for Olympics, Selection/nomination criteria: whether properly followed/implementedAppeal –Cycling New Zealand – athlete not nominated for Olympic selection –– decision appealed on four grounds – urgency – hearing held ––Tribunal upheld appeal – nomination made – reasons to follow
-
Michael Bias v Cycling New Zealand
Bias, Non anti-doping case decisions, Non-nomination for Olympics, Selection/nomination criteria: whether properly followed/implementedAppeal – BMX – Cycling New Zealand – athlete not nominated for Olympic selection – met the primary objective of the nomination criteria –Rico Bearman nominated and athlete nominated as a reserve – decision appealed on basis the nomination criteria not properly followed and/or implemented – bias – urgency – hearing held – not found…
-
Paige Hourigan v Tennis New Zealand
Appeal against decision of NSO, Bias, Non anti-doping case decisions, Non-nomination for Olympics, Selection/nomination criteria: whether properly followed/implemented, Selection/nomination criteria: whether reasonable opportunity to satisfyAppeal –Tennis New Zealand – athlete not nominated for Olympic selection – another player chosen to partner in doubles – decision appealed on four grounds – urgency – hearing held – none of the grounds of appeal made out –Tribunal dismissed appeal
