Anti-doping case decisions

  • New Zealand Rugby League Inc v Jacob Croot

    ,

    ST 13/07 · Decision 14 September 2007 · The Tribunal heard this case under urgency, with the consent of the parties. The Tribunal issued its decision shortly after the hearing. Reasons for the decision were released on 25 September 2007. Overview: Anti-doping – cannabis – recreational use – mitigating circumstances included young age of defendant (16) and that, despite…

    Read more

  • New Zealand Rugby League Inc v Sonny Cavanagh and Joe Vaifale

    ,

    ST 11/07 ST 12/07 · Decision 8 September 2007 · New Zealand Rugby League Inc v Sonny Cavanagh (ST 11/07) and New Zealand Rugby League Inc v Joe Vaifale (ST 12/07). The Tribunal heard both of these cases together, by consent of the parties, under urgency. The Tribunal issued its decision shortly after the hearing. Reasons for the decision…

    Read more

  • Boxing New Zealand Inc v Mark Robertson

    Overview: Anti-doping – failure to provide a urine sample – defendant refused to provide sample in out of competition test – admitted violation – defendant stated had not been boxing for over a year and thought he did not have to provide sample – registration expired – discussion of issue of retirement and recent cases re…

    Read more

  • New Zealand Federation of Body Builders Inc v Mike Pearson

    Overview: Anti-doping – failure to provide a urine sample – defendant refused to provide sample in competition – defendant admitted violation and advised Tribunal that did not want to participate further in the hearing – no further information provided to warrant imposing any penalty other than mandatory 2 year period of ineligibility set out in WADA…

    Read more

  • Boxing New Zealand Inc v Kerry Nathan

    ,

    Overview: Anti-doping – cannabis – recreational use at cousin’s birthday party 2 weeks before tournament where tested positive after winning NZ women’s boxing championship – Tribunal recently released a Minute announcing it will take a new approach to imposing penalties in future cannabis cases – however infraction in present case occurred before release of Minute –…

    Read more

  • New Zealand Rugby League Inc v Vince Whare

    ,

    Overview: Anti-doping – cannabis – second violation – recreational use – used for stress relief during difficult personal circumstances – mandatory 2 years’ ineligibility for second violation imposed – would have been banned for life if had not established drug use not for performance enhancing purposes – cross code effect of suspension – suspension backdated to…

    Read more

  • New Zealand Rugby League Inc v Blake Milner

    ,

    Overview: Anti-doping – cannabis – recreational use – smoked cannabis three weeks before game where tested – aggravating circumstances justifying suspension – defendant previously signed agreement/declaration with NZ Rugby League that aware of their anti-doping policy – that defendant had been dropped from team at time used cannabis and had not expected to be re-selected and…

    Read more

  • Basketball New Zealand v Mark Dickel

    ,

    Overview: Anti-doping – cannabis – NZ representative player – recreational use at party 5 weeks before test – defendant not under contract at time of use – defendant served interim suspension of 2 matches – defendant exposed to adverse publicity and suffered financial consequences as result of interim suspension – no aggravating circumstances justifying further suspension…

    Read more

  • New Zealand Federation of Body Builders Inc v Sam Mohamad

    , , ,

    Overview: Anti-doping – stanozol, hydroclorothiazide and amiloride – defendant failing to participate in proceedings or raise any defence – mandatory 2 years’ ineligibility imposed.

    Read more

  • Touch New Zealand v William Morunga

    ,

    Overview: Anti-doping – Touch player’s second violation with cannabis – mandatory 2 years’ ineligibility for second violation imposed – importance of athletes participating in proceedings – if defendant had not established substance not used for performance enhancing purposes he would have been banned for life for second violation – cross code effect of suspension – any…

    Read more