-
X v Motorcycling NZ (ST05/25)
Appeal against decision of NSO, Jurisdiction, Natural justice, New evidence, Non anti-doping case decisionsAppeal – junior off-road motorcycling – Motorcycling NZ – appeal against decision of Judiciary Committee, following appeal against decision of Protest Committee – grounds of appeal: natural justice denied, acted outside powers/jurisdiction, new evidence – Tribunal found no sufficient opportunity to produce additional evidence at hearing given to appellant – denial of natural justice –
-
Vincent Dalzell v Judo NZ (ST07/25)
Appeal against decision of NSO, Non anti-doping case decisions, Selection/nomination appeals, Selection/nomination criteria: whether properly followed/implementedAppeal – Judo – Judo NZ – Ground of appeal: the selection/nomination criteria were not properly followed/implemented – Tribunal found that the Judo NZ By-Laws were not properly followed/implemented for eligibility – Judo NZ did not exercise their discretion under the correct clause in the By-Law – matter referred back to Judo NZ with guidance
-
Playaz v Volleyball NZ (ST 19/24)
Appeal against decision of NSO, Eligibility/Ineligibility, Jurisdiction, Non anti-doping case decisions, Other appealsAppeal – volleyball – Volleyball NZ – appellant’s team lost a Northern Zone competition match and complained that the opposition team had fielded an ineligible player – that there were failures to comply with Volleyball NZ Transfer Policy and the player was subject to a 12-month suspension – decisions of the regional association and Volleyball
-
Sloan Frost v Motorcycling New Zealand
Appeal – Motorcycle Road Racing – Motorcycling New Zealand – appellant only had four rounds to contribute to net points calculation due to one of the five rounds his son intended to race in was not run – appeal based on breach of natural justice – alleged Judiciary Committee was biased and did not provide
-
Lukas Murphy v Cycling New Zealand
Appeal against decision of NSO, Non anti-doping case decisions, Selection/nomination criteria: whether properly followed/implemented, Selection/nomination criteria: whether reasonable opportunity to satisfyAppeal – Road Racing – Cycling New Zealand – athlete not selected for U23 Individual Time Trial event at 2024 UCI World Champs –- decision appealed on basis the selection criteria not properly followed and/or implemented – no reasonable opportunity to meet the criteria – no material on which the decision could be made –
-
Hannah Thomas v Canoe Slalom New Zealand
Appeal against decision of NSO, Non anti-doping case decisions, Non-nomination for Olympics, Selection/nomination criteria: whether properly followed/implementedAppeal – Canoe Slalom – Canoe Slalom New Zealand – athlete not nominated for Olympic selection – appeal based on not properly implementing the nomination criteria – no opportunity to meet the criteria – no material on which to base the decision – urgency – decision made on the papers – grounds of appeal not
-
Sammie Maxwell v Cycling New Zealand
Appeal against decision of NSO, Bias, Non anti-doping case decisions, Non-nomination for Olympics, Selection/nomination criteria: whether properly followed/implementedAppeal –Cycling New Zealand – athlete not nominated for Olympic selection –– decision appealed on four grounds – urgency – hearing held ––Tribunal upheld appeal – nomination made – reasons to follow
-
Paige Hourigan v Tennis New Zealand
Appeal against decision of NSO, Bias, Non anti-doping case decisions, Non-nomination for Olympics, Selection/nomination criteria: whether properly followed/implemented, Selection/nomination criteria: whether reasonable opportunity to satisfyAppeal –Tennis New Zealand – athlete not nominated for Olympic selection – another player chosen to partner in doubles – decision appealed on four grounds – urgency – hearing held – none of the grounds of appeal made out –Tribunal dismissed appeal
-
Lukas Walton-Keim v Yachting New Zealand
Appeal against decision of NSO, Non anti-doping case decisions, Non-nomination for Olympics, Selection/nomination criteria: whether properly followed/implementedAppeal – Kite foiling – Yachting New Zealand – athlete not nominated for Olympic selection – did not meet the primary or secondary objective of the nomination criteria –decision appealed on basis the nomination criteria not properly followed and/or implemented – urgency – hearing held – not found that the nomination criteria not properly followed
-
Anon v NZCPA
Decision on application for costs.
